What does this certificate actually say?
Upload a Certificate of Analysis and get back an eight-section report that reads it in full — the chemistry, what it means clinically, how the batch compares with its strain, what it is worth, and where the certificate’s own limits are the limits of the analysis.
Minutes, not an afternoon. Every claim traced to the Cannabis Knowledge Foundation, every number read from the certificate itself.
What comes back
A single PDF, roughly eleven pages. Below is an excerpt from a real Full-panel certificate, to show the shape of it.
| Cannabinoid | wt % | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Total THC | 32.159 | High potency; top of the biologically plausible range |
| Total CBD | 0.095 | Negligible — no entourage buffer |
| THCA-A | 36.381 | Raw acid precursor; flower is unheated |
| CBGA | 1.030 | Notable precursor reserve |
A high-potency THC-dominant flower with an unusually even four-way terpene cluster, and an 82% match to the Gold-tier archival fingerprint for its strain — well within normal batch variation.
No microbial panel and no residual solvent panel. Everything tested passes cleanly, but export clearance cannot be signed off from this certificate alone.
Illustrative excerpt from a published certificate. Figures are read from the certificate; the readings beside them are written by the analysis.
Eight ways of reading one certificate
- 01CannabinoidsPotency, decarboxylation arithmetic checked against the lab's own figures
- 02TerpenesThe full profile, and what the balance means in practice
- 03Chemovar fingerprintHow this batch compares with the archive for its strain
- 04Indicated profileEvidence-graded conditions, built from this certificate's chemistry
- 05Clinic guidancePrescriber context with numbered citations
- 06Market positionComparable products, normalised to £/g
- 07Price recommendationFloor, target and ceiling, with the reasoning
- 08ContaminantsThe threshold check — and what the panel does not cover
Sections that a certificate cannot support are omitted rather than filled in. A Basic panel with no terpene results gets an honest note in place of a fingerprint comparison, not a number invented from nothing.
Start free — no card
A free Cannavec account includes 500 credits a month. A COA report costs 10, so that is up to 50 reports — plus 2 to regenerate one and 1 to ask a question about it. Chemovar Fingerprint benchmarking against the archive is available on the paid tiers.
What you get
Any certificate, any lab
Basic, Basic Plus or Full panels, from any laboratory, in any source language. The certificate type is detected from the panels present, not asked for.
Benchmarked, not guessed
Terpene proportions are compared against an archive of roughly 2,900 chemovar fingerprints, each built from many independently tested batches.
Says what it cannot say
A missing microbial panel, an unstated processing method, a strain name inferred from a filename — each is reported as a finding, never quietly papered over.
Evidence-graded throughout
Every clinical claim carries an A/B/C grade and traces to the Cannabis Knowledge Foundation, so you can see how firmly the literature supports it.
For industry and professional use. Evidence-graded research summaries — not medical advice, a diagnosis, or a guarantee of efficacy. Not a substitute for statutory product testing or regulatory batch-release criteria.